2026/05/06 by Linda Barclay, Milan Andrejević, Jakob Hohwy · 1 voice
Arts and Humanities · Medicine · Social Sciences · #Patient Dignity and Privacy #Philosophical Ethics and Theory #Political Philosophy and Ethics
paper · doi:10.1080/09515089.2026.2669962
openalex publication_date 2026/05/06 · openalex created_date 2026/05/07 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/22
Appeals to the value of treating people with dignity are commonplace in certain community settings, especially in health, disability, and aged care. In contrast, dignity has been relatively neglected by philosophers, not receiving the careful scrutiny most other moral concepts have been afforded. This has recently changed, with a spate of new philosophical books and articles about the meaning and value of dignity. No consensus has emerged about what dignity means or about how it is distinct from other moral values. Here, we seek to advance the debate by integrating philosophical theory with findings from empirical studies. Specifically, we argue that when people appeal to dignity in community settings they are most likely appealing to the value of not humiliating people, where to humiliate another is to treat them as a social inferior. We review two previous empirical studies which we conducted to test how lay people understand dignity. By considering these two studies together and integrating our findings with philosophical debate about the meaning of dignity, we show in this paper that lay people indeed understand dignity in line with the view that dignity means treating others as our social equals.