vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Canadian Society of Nephrology Commentary on the 2025 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Clinical Practice Guidelines for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

2026/06/01 by Matthew B. Lanktree, Nick Ashawasega, Micheli Bevilacqua +16 · 1 voice
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Medicine · #Dialysis and Renal Disease Management #Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases #Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies

paper · doi:10.1177/20543581261455635

openalex publication_date 2026/06/01 · openalex created_date 2026/06/04 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22

Abstract

Purpose of review: 1) Provide a Canadian perspective on the 2025 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) guidelines; 2) identify challenges and nuances in applying these guidelines in Canada; 3) highlight shifts in expert practice points for Canadian care providers; 4) outline opportunities for research, knowledge translation, and quality improvement in Canada. Sources of information: The KDIGO 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the management of ADPKD, as well as a survey and discussion by Canadian experts in ADPKD. Methods: The co-chairs invited stakeholders from the Canadian ADPKD community to ensure national representation, including adult and pediatric clinicians, trainees, a genetic counselor, and a patient partner with an Indigenous perspective. Members were surveyed to identify key practice points. Subgroups reviewed issues and drafted discussion topics. All members reviewed the final draft. Key Findings: The committee commented on recommendations with nuance for Canadian practitioners, especially on multidisciplinary care, challenges with genetic testing, and the use of CKD therapies like sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in ADPKD. Limitations: The committee relied on the evidence summaries produced by KDIGO and the experience and knowledge of committee members. The committee did not replicate or update the systematic reviews.

Citations

Discussions

Related