2026/07/15 by Marta Costa Costa · 1 voice
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · #Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics #Spanish History and Politics #World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
paper · doi:10.1111/1468-229x.70138
openalex publication_date 2026/07/15 · openalex created_date 2026/07/17 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/17
Abstract Despite the role of foreign intervention in the Spanish Civil War, the word intervención rarely appeared in contemporary media and official discourse. This article examines the expressions that Republican and rebel authorities used to represent the presence of outside forces in Spain. Republicans portrayed aid from Germany, Italy and Portugal to the rebels as imperial aggression violating Spain's sovereignty, while minimizing Soviet support for the Republic as spontaneous international solidarity. In contrast, the rebels cast the Soviet Union as an existential, Asiatic threat to the nation and framed their own foreign aid as providential, ‘civilizational’ camaraderie. These constructions left a lasting imprint on the postwar memory of the conflict. Under Franco's regime, anti‐Soviet narratives were recycled, while traces of its alliances with Germany and Italy were gradually erased, particularly following their defeat in the Second World War. By focusing on the language surrounding intervention in the Spanish Civil War, this article underscores the need to treat concepts in conflicts not as neutral categories but as ideologically loaded instruments central to the construction and contestation of meaning in civil war.