2026/01/01 by Georgia Diamanti, Marije van Santen, Jessica Duncan +1 · 1 voice
Agricultural and Biological Sciences · #Agricultural Economics and Policy #Rural development and sustainability #Land Rights and Reforms
paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/soru.70022
openalex publication_date 2026/01/01 · openalex created_date 2026/01/09 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
ABSTRACT The European Commission has made an explicit commitment to gender equality. But does the EU's oldest and most financially significant common policy support this goal? This paper investigates the gendered effects of the latest reform of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), specifically Pillar I (Direct Support and Market Measures). Given that CAP policies are translated into National Strategic Plans (NSPs), we illustrate and ground our analysis with examples from the Dutch NSP. Following a review of the role of women in EU agriculture, we present an interpretivist policy analysis. Guided by the framework of feminist institutionalism, we examine the policy for ‘rules about gender’ and ‘rules with gendered effects’. It is concluded that the CAP, through its gender neutrality, fails to adequately consider women. Our analysis further shows that some interventions may potentially discriminate against women farmers—either creating or further solidifying structural disadvantages.