2012/07/31 by Bryan Pitts · 1 voice
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · #African history and culture studies #Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
paper · doi:10.1215/00182168-1600297
openalex publication_date 2012/07/31 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
Abstract In 1978, as striking metalworkers, students, and a revitalized political opposition challenged the Brazilian military regime from without, a stunning rebellion by the regime’s civilian allies in São Paulo undermined it from within. Dealing the regime a shocking political defeat, the delegates to the regime-allied political party’s state convention rejected the generals’ anointed gubernatorial candidate and narrowly nominated the rebel Paulo Maluf, who would go on to be confirmed by a manipulated electoral college. Although Maluf and the delegates did not challenge the regime on ideological grounds, the mix of resentment, regionalism, and personal rivalries that drove their insurrection and the generals’ reluctant tolerance of it highlight the fragility of the regime’s support among those who were thought to be its most stalwart allies. Moreover, Maluf’s selection demonstrates key differences between the Brazilian military regime and its Southern Cone counterparts and expands our understanding of how authoritarian regimes placed constraints upon and were in turn constrained by civilian political elites.