vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Limits and Trade-Offs of Shift-Invariant Meta-Optical Encoders for Image Compression

2026/02/28 by Yubo Zhang, Rui Chen, Zhihao Zhou +1
Physics and Astronomy · #physics.optics

paper · pdf

4 pages, 4 figures

arxiv created 2026/07/30 · arxiv updated 2026/07/31

Abstract

Meta-optical encoders can reduce image data before electronic readout or transmission, but engineered point-spread functions (PSFs) do not automatically outperform conventional imaging. We study scene-agnostic, shift-invariant, linear optical encoders using both a fixed total-variation (TV) reconstruction backend and a learned YOLOv8 detection backend. Under a measurement-budget definition of compression ratio that counts all sensed samples across all channels, we compare lens imaging with spatial binning, positive random multi-channel PSFs, signed random kernels, and orthogonal multi-channel kernels. In the low-noise regime, lens-binning gives the highest reconstruction fidelity and strongest YOLOv8 detection metrics at the same compression ratio. Multi-channel encoders, however, degrade more slowly under measurement noise because the measurements are distributed across complementary channels. These results show that, for scene-agnostic incoherent imaging, engineered convolutional PSFs should be justified primarily by robustness, multiplexing, or downstream system constraints, rather than by an expectation that generic wavefront coding will outperform lens-based binning.

Related