vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

The role of supplemental lighting during late fall and winter on photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic pigments biosynthesis of cut rose flower ( Rosa hybrida cv. ‘Dolce Vita’)

2023/12/26 by Alireza Khaleghi, Ali Khadivi, Morteza Akramian +1 · 1 voice
Agricultural and Biological Sciences · #Light effects on plants #Plant Molecular Biology Research #Plant and animal studies

paper · doi:10.1080/14620316.2023.2298991

openalex publication_date 2023/12/26 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/15

Abstract

Low levels of natural light within the late fall and winter periods are main restricting factors for greenhouse-cut rose flower production in northern countries. Here, the effects of supplemental lighting on photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic pigments and the morphological response of cut rose flower cv. ‘Dolce Vita’ were investigated. Four different supplemental lighting regimes, including 85, 170, 255, and 340 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD using a high-pressure sodium lamp for a six-hour day extension started at sunset were applied to rose plants during late fall and winter. With increasing light intensity to 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD, the content of chlorophyll a, total chlorophyll, carotenoid content, and the ratio of chlorophylls a/b as well as amount of anthocyanins greatly improved. The highest phenol content and total antioxidant capacity was observed in 170 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD. Moreover, extending of daylength by light intensity of 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD had a significant affirmative effect on traits of growth, including flower stem length (P < 0.01), leaf number (P < 0.05), renewal bud formation (P < 0.05), time of harvesting (P < 0.05), and vase life of cut flowers (P < 0.01). Considering physiological and morphological improvement, extending of daylength from 10-h to 16-h by supplemental light of 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD would be the best choice to cultivate cut rose flower cv. ‘Dolce Vita’.

Citations

Discussions

Related