2026/06/01 by Erik Frykholm, Jesper Boman‐Häggbom, Henrik Holmberg +6 · 1 voice
Medicine · Engineering · #Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control #Cardiovascular and exercise physiology #Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
paper · pdf · doi:10.14814/phy2.70910
openalex publication_date 2026/06/01 · openalex created_date 2026/06/18 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/27
Heart rate variability (HRV), a marker of cardiovascular health, declines with aging and physical inactivity. We compared the effects of supramaximal high-intensity interval training (HIT) with brief intervals and moderate-intensity training (MIT) on HRV in non-exercising older adults. Sixty-eight participants were randomized to 12 weeks of supervised cycling performed twice weekly: supramaximal HIT (10 × 6-s intervals) or MIT (3 × 8-min intervals), with training intensity individually prescribed and progressively increased over the intervention using external power output. HRV was assessed using time-domain indices (SDNN, RMSSD, and LnRMSSD) and resting heart rate from 5-min segments, derived from 10-min recordings collected in participants' homes on seven consecutive days at baseline and follow-up. Between-group differences in change favored supramaximal HIT for SDNN (5.4 ms [95% CI: 1.1-9.7]), RMSSD (3.5 ms [0.7-6.3]), and LnRMSSD (0.15 [0.01-0.28]). Within-group changes showed an increase in RMSSD in the HIT group (2.0 ms [0.1-4.0]) and a decrease in SDNN in the MIT group (-3.1 ms [-6.2 to -0.1]). Resting heart rate did not differ between groups. In conclusion, supramaximal HIT induced more favorable HRV adaptations than MIT in non-exercising older adults.