2026/06/28 by Matthew C. Makel, Melanie S. Meyer, Mary A. Pei · 1 voice
Social Sciences · Decision Sciences · #Qualitative Research Methods and Applications #Evaluation and Performance Assessment
paper · pdf · doi:10.1080/13803611.2026.2693313
openalex created_date 2025/10/23 · openalex publication_date 2026/06/28 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31
In 2022, we argued that replication is relevant to qualitative research. In this manuscript, we update and clarify that idea to make three more specific claims about replication in qualitative research: (1) it is possible, (2) it can be relevant, and (3) it can be useful. We provide practical examples and draw attention to two areas we believe need continued consideration: when to conduct a replication and jingle-jangle problems. We conclude that quantitative tools should not automatically be assumed to apply to qualitative research or forced upon qualitative researchers. However, this should not be conflated with the more extreme position – one we disagree with – that methods from quantitative research, including replication, should never be applied to qualitative research.