2026/07/20 by Cardell, Randall, Nielsen +7 · 1 voice
Health Professions · Social Sciences · #Global Health Workforce Issues #Athletic Training and Education #Education Systems and Policy
paper · pdf · doi:10.22605/rrh10326
openalex publication_date 2026/07/20 · openalex created_date 2026/07/21 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the workforce outcomes and costs associated with implementing Rural Generalist Training Positions (RGTPs) in public health services in Queensland, Australia. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted between January 2019 and October 2021. Rural and organisational retention of employees was calculated as the median time to event, either transfer to a non-rural or remote Queensland Health service or permanent separation from the organisation, respectively, and the mean difference using a two-sample t-test with equal variance, with statistical significance set at 0.05. Descriptive analysis was performed to evaluate education and promotion outcomes. Retention and promotion of employees in RGTPs ('trainees') were compared with a group of allied health professionals in standard base-grade rural or remote clinical positions. A cost analysis calculated the additional cost of implementing an RGTP compared to a standard early-career allied health position from the perspective of the employing health service. RESULTS: Forty-five allied health professionals employed in an RGTP ('trainees') and 53 non-trainees were eligible for analysis. Participants' professions were nutrition and dietetics, occupational therapy, pharmacy, physiotherapy, podiatry, speech pathology and social work. Compared to non-trainees, trainees were retained significantly longer in their original rural or remote location prior to relocation (mean difference 153 days, 95%CI 55-252 days, p=0.003); in any Modified Monash (MM) Model category 4-7 (MM 4 to MM 7) location until moving to an MM 1 to MM 3 location (mean difference 172 days, 95%CI 62-277 days, p=0.003) and in any MM 2 to MM 7 location until moving to an MM 1 location (mean difference 139 days, 95%CI 11-266 days, p=0.035). The trainee group had a total of 51 enrolments across two approved postgraduate rural generalist education courses, including six participants who undertook both courses. There were 22 (43.1%) course completions, 16 (31.4%) withdrawals, and 13 (25.5%) were continuing studies at the conclusion of data collection. More trainees were promoted above base grade Health Practitioner Level 3 (39%) than employees in the non-trainee group (29%). The total average annual cost for a health service to implement an early-career allied health position as an RGTP was between 10,730 and 15,718, which was fully covered by organisation funding grants of a minimum 25,000 per annum. CONCLUSION: RGTPs showed favourable outcomes for retention, education and promotion of early-career allied health professionals in rural and remote public health services compared to similar employees in standard positions. Implementation costs for a rural or remote work unit were manageable. The RGTPs provide good value for the health services through focusing training and development investment on early-career allied health professionals who are retained for longer in rural or remote communities.