vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Industry’s colonization of psychiatry: Ethical and practical implications of financial conflicts of interest in the DSM-5

2013/02/01 by Lisa Cosgrove, Emily E. Wheeler · 1 voice · 1 citation
Psychology · Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics · Medicine · #Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices #Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare #Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

paper · doi:10.1177/0959353512467972

openalex publication_date 2013/02/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22

Abstract

The revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), scheduled for publication in May 2013 by the American Psychiatric Association (APA), has created a firestorm of controversy because of questions about undue industry influence. Specifically, concerns have been raised about financial conflicts of interest between DSM-5 panel members and the pharmaceutical industry. The authors argue that current approaches to the management of these relationships, particularly transparency of them, are insufficient solutions to the problem of industry’s capture of organized psychiatry. The conceptual framework of institutional corruption is used to understand psychiatry’s dependence on the pharmaceutical industry and to identify the epistemic assumptions that ground the DSM’s biopsychiatric discourse. APA’s rationale for including premenstrual dysphoric disorder in the DSM-5 as a Mood Disorder is reviewed and discussed.

Citations

Cited by

Discussions

Related