Research integrity, thick and thin

2025/07/29 by Michael Vincent, Mark Hooper · 2 voices
Medicine · Decision Sciences · #Health and Medical Research Impacts #scientometrics and bibliometrics research #Academic Publishing and Open Access

paper · pdf · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05157-6

Abstract

Abstract We contrast two value-schemas of research integrity. One is the ‘thick’ ethos of an immersed and ethical researcher. The other is the ‘thin’ rules, responsibilities, and metrics that we use to communicate, enforce and assess research integrity in a widespread and impersonal way. By drawing on philosophical, psychological, behavioural economic, and historical perspectives, we analyse how these schemas interact, with the aim of improving cultural change in the research sector. We look particularly at such pathologies of thin values as crowding-out effects and proxy failure. We argue that understanding the relationship between the thick and thin schemas is essential for avoiding unsuccessful and even counterproductive attempts to promote research integrity. A combination of thick and thin schemas is vital to a large and diverse research community. Moreover, we argue that there is an ‘essential tension’ between the two, and that cultural change will only be successful and sustainable if we continually reflect on whether the thin values that we use to communicate, enforce and assess research integrity are serving the thicker ethos that we really seek to promote.

Citations

• Identifying Fabricated Networks within Authorship-for-Sale Enterprises
• The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science
• The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.

Discussions

• Yes yes, thank you Drs Vincent and @markhooper.bsky.social, but really you could have just stopped at "the work is excellent" and avoided all of the subsequent nitpicking, however unfortunately accura [bsky, 9 points, 1 comments]
• Nice article on cultural change in the research sector: "meaningful change will require a nuanced understanding of the way that rules, norms, and incentives can interact in complex ways, and sometimes [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]

Related

• The trinity of good research: Distinguishing between research integrity, ethics, and governance
• Navigating the Science System: Research Integrity and Academic Survival Strategies
• Aligning Scientific Values and Research Integrity: A Study of Researchers’ Perceptions and Practices in Four Countries
• Performing Integrity: Managing Misalignment while Researching Transgressive Social Worlds
• Shared responsibility to address questionable research practices? – A study of perceived efficacy of organizational research integrity policies