2025/07/23 by Mónica Brito Vieira, Sean Fleming · 1 voice
Environmental Science · Social Sciences · #Climate Change and Geoengineering #Environmental Philosophy and Ethics #Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
paper · pdf · doi:10.1017/s0003055425100762
openalex created_date 2025/07/23 · openalex publication_date 2025/07/23 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/02
Aotearoa New Zealand’s recognition of the Whanganui River as a legal person in 2017 has generated a lively debate. While advocates argue that ascribing personhood to natural entities is a powerful tool for redressing historical injustices against Indigenous peoples and for protecting the environment, critics argue that it is incompatible with Western legal and political systems. In this article, we use Thomas Hobbes’s theory of personhood to develop a novel account of ecological personhood. Hobbes explains how natural entities can be empowered to speak and act through authorized representatives, much as states, corporations, and wards do. Our Hobbesian account has three main payoffs. First, it offers a bridge between different legal orders and ontologies of nature. Second, it explains how “ecoship” is normatively different from corporate personhood and guardianship. Third, it highlights both the transformative potential of ecological persons and the ways in which they can be coopted and subverted.