Sound quality, not speech recognition, explains cochlear implant-related quality of life outcomes

2025/10/01 by Katelyn A. Berg, Hugh M. Birky, Victoria A. Sevich +2 · 1 voice
Neuroscience · Health Professions · #Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation #Noise Effects and Management #Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

paper · pdf · doi:10.1121/10.0039069

openalex publication_date 2025/10/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/15 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/25

Abstract

This study examined relationships between cochlear implant-aided speech recognition, sound quality ratings, and quality of life outcomes in 41 adult cochlear implant users. Participants completed word and sentence recognition tasks, the Speech, Spatial and Qualities (SSQ) questionnaire, and the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) questionnaire. Sound quality ratings on SSQ showed a weak correlation with sentence recognition in noise but strong positive correlations with CIQOL scores. Sound quality independently predicted quality of life, explaining 32% of global score variance, while speech recognition measures showed no effects. These findings highlight sound quality as a distinct and meaningful outcome metric.

Citations

• The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ)

Discussions

• JASA EXPRESS LETTERS Sound quality, not speech recognition, explains cochlear implant-related quality of life outcomes: https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0039069 [bsky, 2 points, 0 comments]

Related

• The effect of speech and noise levels on the quality perceived by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners
• Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with cochlear implants: self and proxy reports
• Anatomy-based fitting versus standard mapping of cochlear implants: A study on speech perception and hearing quality
• The development of quality of life and hearing ability of adult cochlear implant users in the course of outpatient cochlear implant follow-up therapy
• Audiometric profile of cochlear implant recipients