2012/06/18 by Immanuel Kant, Allen W. Wood · 1 voice
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · #Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations #Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
paper · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813306.012
openalex publication_date 2012/06/18 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30
Introduction In 1795 King Frederick William II of Prussia withdrew from the War of the First Coalition and, on April 5, concluded the separate Peace of Basel with the revolutionary government of France. In a letter of August 15 of the same year (12: 35) Kant offered the Königsberg publisher Nicolovius what may well be the most widely read of his informal works, Toward Perpetual Peace . Projects for “perpetual peace,” and criticisms of them, had been in the air since 1713, when the Abbé St. Pierre, a secretary at the congress preceding the Treaty of Utrecht, had published the first two volumes of his Projet pour rendre la paix perpetuelle en Europe . Among the more prominent of his defenders and critics were Leibniz, Voltaire, Frederick the Great, and Rousseau. As might be expected, Kant was aware of the debate. In a Reflection that Adickes dates from about 1755 Kant notes Bayle's view that, although “it is possible in abstracto to put the rules of Christianity into practice, this is not the case with regard to princes: it was impossible in connection with the Abbé St. Pierre's proposal” (6: 241; AK 16, #2116). As the present essay shows, Kant did not consider the idea of a league of nations impossible, but he did not rely for his evidence upon experience of how princes have behaved.