2025/11/06 by Qijun Zheng · 1 voice
Social Sciences · Environmental Science · #Chinese history and philosophy #Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond #Geographies of human-animal interactions
paper · pdf · doi:10.3390/rel16111419
This article examines how a Daoist sacred mountain community in east China historically intertwined its religious life with the rhythms of the natural world, thereby challenging the conventional divide between “nature” and “culture.” Centering on the sacred mountain Maoshan—renowned for its cult of transcendents and its symbolic association with migrating cranes—the study shows how annual pilgrimage cycles were deliberately synchronized with avian migration patterns. Drawing on classical texts, religious scriptures, gazetteers, steles and imperial edicts, we reveal that the timing of rituals and imperial edicts at Maoshan aligned with the cranes’ arrival and departure, regulating human activities like logging, hunting and farming in this holy landscape. Such evidence demonstrates that Chinese religious practice not only reflected cosmological beliefs but also actively modeled human lifeworlds on non-human cycles, blurring the boundary between the social and the ecological. Over two millennia, Maoshan’s integrated ritual–ecological system helped conserve biodiversity (by protecting habitat during key seasons) and reinforced a worldview in which humans and auspicious animals were partners in a shared cosmic order. As environmental conditions shifted in later eras—through deforestation, climate change, and social upheaval—this nature-attuned tradition was forced to adapt, illuminating both the potency and precarity of a cosmology grounded in predictable natural rhythms. By highlighting a case where religious institutions and animal agency co-produced a sustainable temporal regime, the study contributes to broader anthropological debates on relational ontology in East Asia. It suggests that classical Daoist cosmology, often classified as “analogist,” in fact operated as a form of relational monism: an enduring conviction that human society and the living environment are co-constitutive and continuous. Through the lens of Maoshan’s history, we reconsider how premodern models of “unity of Heaven and humanity” were pragmatically applied, and we explore their implications for reimagining nature–culture relationships amid the uncertainties of the Anthropocene.