Comparison of Inhibition and Consolidation Theories of Spaced Practice Effects

1988/02/01 by Linda J. Ball, R. B. Payne

paper · doi:10.2466/pms.1988.66.1.219

crossref issued 1988/02/01 · crossref published 1988/02/01 · crossref published-online 1988/02/01 · crossref published-print 1988/02/01 · crossref created 2011/08/31 · crossref deposited 2026/05/01 · crossref indexed 2026/07/30

Abstract

Inhibition and consolidation theories of spaced practice effects in psychomotor performance were compared in terms of the accuracy with which they were able to forecast the decremental consequences of massed practice following variable amounts of well-spaced practice on a rotary pursuit task. As predicted by inhibition theory, the rate of performance decrement during the massed trials was independent of the amount of previously spaced practice. This was contrary to an implication of consolidation theory, which predicted an inverse relationship between decremental rate and amount of previous practice. These and kindred data, reviewed herein, continue to sustain inhibition theory as the explanation of choice.

Related

• Distribution of Practice Combined with Observational Learning Has Time Dependent Effects on Motor Skill Acquisition
• Why practice reduces dual-task interference.
• The effects of interleaved practice
• The Influence of Degree of Interpolated Learning on Retroactive Inhibition and the Overt Transfer of Specific Responses
• Proactive Interference in Short-Term Motor Retention