2009/07/01 by Robert Davidson, R.A. Davidson, C.F. Davidson +3
Agricultural and Biological Sciences · Engineering · Environmental Science · #Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies #Plant responses to water stress #Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements
paper · doi:10.2489/jswc.64.4.243
crossref issued 2009/07/01 · crossref published 2009/07/01 · crossref published-online 2009/07/01 · crossref published-print 2009/07/01 · openalex publication_date 2009/07/01 · crossref created 2009/08/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · crossref deposited 2026/07/21 · crossref indexed 2026/07/25 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Controlling erosion, reestablishing vegetation, and overcoming the negative effects of hydrophobic soils has long been a challenge following catastrophic wildfire on forested lands and rangelands. A three-year controlled study was recently completed to compare polyacrylamide soil treatment to the traditional cover method using agricultural straw on high severity burned soils of the Red Bull Fire, which burned through the Uinta National Forest near Provo, Utah, in July and August of 2004. Weed free, recycled paper pellets containing polyacrylamide were found to be an effective Burn Area Emergency Rehabilitation treatment option on clay rich soils containing divalent cations (i.e., Ca<sup>2+</sup>) within the soil matrix. This study showed aerial application of the granular polyacrylamide pellets resulted in an even distribution of the polymer-based product on the soil surface. Through water activation, a blend of water-soluble linear anionic polyacrylamide copolymers are slowly released, which bind with the soil particles, structurally stabilizing the soil. When compared to agricultural straw, polyacrylamide results show improved revegetation, reduced soil hydrophobicity, and reduced soil erosion.