2024/04/19 by Ilaíne Silveira Matos, Samantha J. McDonough, Breanna Carrillo Johnson +11 · 1 voice
Agricultural and Biological Sciences · Environmental Science · #Fire effects on ecosystems #Plant responses to elevated CO2 #Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/nph.19771
openalex publication_date 2024/04/19 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Xylem conduits have lignified walls to resist crushing pressures. The thicker the double-wall (T) relative to its diameter (D), the greater the implosion safety. Having safer conduits may incur higher costs and reduced flow, while having less resistant xylem may lead to catastrophic collapse under drought. Although recent studies have shown that conduit implosion commonly occurs in leaves, little is known about how leaf xylem scales T vs D to trade off safety, flow efficiency, mechanical support, and cost. We measured T and D in > 7000 conduits of 122 species to investigate how T vs D scaling varies across clades, habitats, growth forms, leaf, and vein sizes. As conduits become wider, their double-cell walls become proportionally thinner, resulting in a negative allometry between T and D. That is, narrower conduits, which are usually subjected to more negative pressures, are proportionally safer than wider ones. Higher implosion safety (i.e. higher T/D ratios) was found in asterids, arid habitats, shrubs, small leaves, and minor veins. Despite the strong allometry, implosion safety does not clearly trade off with other measured leaf functions, suggesting that implosion safety at whole-leaf level cannot be easily predicted solely by individual conduits' anatomy.