2012/10/01 by Elizabeth Holt · 1 voice
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · Psychology · #Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies #Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism #Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
paper · doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.726886
openalex publication_date 2012/10/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
This research uses conversation analysis to explore a collection of extracts from telephone calls involving laughter as a response in a sequence characterized by complaining. In these instances, the laugh responses fail to align with the complaint in progress and are somewhat disaffiliative (in that they do not display the same stance as that taken by the complainant). However, they do not strongly disaffiliate; they do not, for example, overtly disagree with complaint-relevant assessments produced in prior turns. In this way, recipients of a complaint work to display a somewhat discordant stance to that of the teller, and to discourage further development of the topic in progress while maintaining social solidarity. Thus, the current research adds to the finding (see also Drew, 1987 Drew, P. 1987. Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics, 25: 219–253. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], and Jefferson, Sacks, & Schegloff, 1987 Jefferson, G., Sacks, H. and Schegloff, E. 1987. “Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy”. In Talk and social organisation, Edited by: Button, G. and Lee, J. R. E. 152–205. Clevedon, , England: Multilingual Matters. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) that laughter can be located somewhere in the middle of a continuum ranging from overt affiliation to disaffiliation (Glenn, 2003 Glenn, P. 2003. Laughter in interaction, Cambridge, , England: Cambridge University Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], ch. 6).