vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

The role of “zero-responders” during 7/7: implications for the emergency services

2013/10/21 by Chris Cocking · 1 voice
Health Professions · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Disaster Management and Resilience #Disaster Response and Management #Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

paper · doi:10.1108/ijes-08-2012-0035

openalex publication_date 2013/10/21 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/02

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the psychological processes involved in spontaneous co-operation by survivors of mass emergencies, and the possible implications this may have for emergency responders. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative interview study was conducted with 12 survivors and witnesses of the 7 July 2005 London bombings. Data were subjected to thematic analysis. Findings – Spontaneous co-operation amongst survivors often emerged, and this was a function of a common identity that grew out of a sense of shared fate amongst those affected. Some social influence that encouraged co-operation also occurred, and this was dependent upon whether there was a sense of shared identity between source and target of influence. Research limitations/implications – Evidence was only collected from a sub-set of one incident (7/7), thus limiting possible generalisability of the findings. Further research into comparable situations would provide a better understanding of the processes underlying mutual co-operation and support amongst emergency survivors. Practical implications – Uninjured bystanders in emergencies can act as “zero-responders”, and so may become a useful resource which can be utilised by the emergency services in mass emergencies. Originality/value – This is the first paper to explore in detail the social influence processes underlying spontaneous co-operation amongst survivors of emergencies, and will be of use to emergency responders.

Citations

Discussions

Related