2025/02/05 by Isabel Köster · 1 voice
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · #Classical Antiquity Studies #Globalization, Historical Perspectives, and International Relations #Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
paper · pdf · doi:10.3998/mpub.14532107
openalex created_date 2025/02/05 · openalex publication_date 2025/02/05 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
<I>Stealing from the Gods</I> investigates how authors writing between the first century BCE and second century CE addressed the issue of temple robbery or <I>sacrilegium</I>. As a self-proclaimed empire of pious people, the Romans viewed temple robbery as deeply un-Roman and among the worst of offenses. On the other hand, given the constant financial pressures of warfare and administration, it was inevitable that the Romans would make use of the riches stored in sanctuaries. In order to resolve this dilemma, the Romans distinguished sharply between acceptable and unacceptable removals of sacred property. When those who conducted themselves as proper Romans plundered the property of the gods, their actions were for the good of the state. In contrast, the temple robber was viewed as a stranger to the norms of Roman society and an enemy of the state.<BR /><BR /> Ancient authors including Cicero, Caesar, Livy, Appian, and Pausanias present isolated, grotesque individuals whose actions have no bearing on the conduct of Romans as a whole, rendering temple robbery not a matter of collective responsibility, but of individual moral failure. By revealing how narratives of temple robbery are constructed from a literary perspective and how they inform discourses about military conquest and imperial rule, Isabel K. Köster shines a new light on how the Romans coped with the more pernicious aspects of their empire.<BR />