2026/01/26 by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft · 1 voice · 2 citations
Social Sciences · #Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies #Political Philosophy and Ethics #Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
paper · doi:10.1177/00323217251409057
openalex publication_date 2026/01/26 · openalex created_date 2026/01/27 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
In studies of non-majoritarian institutions, there is a widespread idea that political neutrality, epistemic authority, and technical expertise are sources of legitimacy. Empirical studies tend to find that such appeals are effective sources of legitimacy, but theorists are overwhelmingly skeptical of their normative appeal. This article’s conceptual ambition is to unify the disparate debates under the term technical legitimacy . The article’s theoretical ambition is to improve on the normative debate on technical legitimacy. Existing defenses fail to robustly satisfy the reasons that ground delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. I propose conditions for accepting technical legitimacy that are reasonably robust against counterfactuals. Technical legitimacy must meet three criteria. Institutions must promote a functionally specified common good; build on sound and undistorted expertise; and, perhaps counterintuitively, contain appropriate venues for value input.