vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Digital history and the specimen database: Mohamed Haniff (1872–1930) and colonial ethnobotany in the Singapore Herbarium

2025/10/01 by Katherine M. Enright · 1 voice
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · #Australian Indigenous Culture and History #Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis #History of Science and Natural History

paper · doi:10.3366/anh.2025.1001

openalex publication_date 2025/10/01 · openalex created_date 2025/12/22 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/25

Abstract

With a focus on specimens from 1920s Malaya in the Singapore Herbarium (SING), this paper explores how historians can productively engage with natural science collections databases to study botanical collecting. The database is the most recent iteration of a longer history of information organization in the herbarium. This history, combined with an analysis of the transformation of the herbarium sheet into specimen metadata, informs the development of a critical digital humanities approach to reading a database of historical specimens as a colonial archive. The addition of digital methods to the historian’s toolkit can help ‘cross-contextualize’ the overlapping digital, textual, and material products of natural history to draw together traces of historical figures under-represented in surviving written records. The central case study is the career of Penang-born botanist Mohamed Haniff (1872–1930) and his contributions to ‘Malay village medicine’ (1930), a materia medica compendium co-authored with Singapore Botanic Gardens Director Isaac Henry Burkill (1870–1965). Triangulating between metadata from the specimen database, ‘Malay village medicine’, and herbarium sheets reveals details of Haniff’s collecting itineraries and ethnobotanical encounters with traditional knowledge keepers, like the bomoh (healer) Lebai Ishak. Drawing on geographical metadata and the ethnobotanical compendium, a digital map of Haniff’s encounters with unnamed Malay and Orang Asli bidan (midwives) highlights the limits of these archival excavations. This methodological approach helps foreground local actors’ collecting practices and opens new lines of inquiry into the nature of go-betweens and collaboration in colonial botany.

Citations

Discussions

Related