2026/06/01 by André Diegmann, Steffen Müller, Benjamin Schoefer · 1 voice
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · #Labor market dynamics and wage inequality #Economic Policies and Impacts #Politics, Economics, and Education Policy
paper · doi:10.18717/dphyb5-3v45
openalex publication_date 2026/06/01 · openalex created_date 2026/06/03 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/16
We revisit the employer size wage effect (ESWE) - arguably the most basic and influential departure from the law of one price for labor. Our main result is that this canonical fact disappears completely across establishments within the same firm, even though they operate in different local labor markets. We uncover and dissect this fact by including a firm fixed effect in otherwise standard cross-sectional regressions of wages on establishment size. We implement this demanding specification in population-wide triple-linked firm-establishment-employee data in Germany. This result is new in the ESWE literature (for which our paper also provides the first systematic meta-analysis). This wage-size decoupling is hard to square with the view that employment is determined along a finitely elastic employerspecific labor supply curve - i.e., employers pay exactly the minimum needed for the quantity of labor, but no more - the foundation of the monopsony view. By contrast, large multi-establishment firms (MEF) appear to hire off their labor supply curves (or those curves are very elastic), pay wage premia above the monopsonistic minimum, and leave excess labor supply. We find some evidence for a reemergence of the ESWE within low-premium MEFs. Overall, at least for the 25% of German employment in large firms for which the ESWE disappears, wage setting and employment determination may be better accounted for by alternative models, namely accommodating above-market-clearing wage premia and rationing of labor supply, such as efficiency wage theories.