2025/12/22 by André Valois, Mariana Lima de Morais, Lúcia Ribeiro Dias +4 · 1 voice
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Immunology and Microbiology · Medicine · #Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria #Antibiotic Use and Resistance #Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
paper · pdf · doi:10.1017/ash.2025.10263
openalex created_date 2025/12/22 · openalex publication_date 2025/12/22 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
Objective: To evaluate physician engagement with an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) at a tertiary hospital and identify areas for improvement in the delivery of stewardship interventions. Design: Cross-sectional survey study. Setting: A 1200-bed tertiary care public hospital in Portugal. Participants: Physicians with antibiotic prescribing privileges in inpatient settings. All physicians with active institutional e-mail addresses were invited to participate. Methods: An anonymous web-based questionnaire was administered between June and December 2024. The survey addressed six domains: (1) antibiotic knowledge; (2) awareness and use of local prescribing protocols; (3) access to antimicrobial use and resistance reports; (4) awareness of antibiotic restriction policies; (5) use of informal consultations with the stewardship team; and (6) participation in scheduled multidisciplinary case discussions. Results: A total of 154 prescribing physicians responded (response rate: 10%), including specialists (75.3%) and residents (24.0%). Most respondents were aware of institutional protocols (78.6%), but 66.9% reported rarely or never consulting them, citing accessibility and reliance on personal knowledge as key barriers. Participation in case discussions was limited (25.3%) but viewed as highly useful. Awareness of restrictive antibiotic policies was low; however, 69.5% indicated that these policies influenced their prescribing behavior. Respondents expressed strong interest in regular feedback on antimicrobial use and resistance trends. Conclusions: Key areas for improvement in ASP implementation include enhancing access to protocols, expanding case-based discussions, clarifying communication around restrictions, and establishing regular feedback mechanisms. These findings may inform efforts to align ASP strategies with clinical realities in similar hospital settings.