Potential for Harm and Privacy Are Top AI Ethics Concerns: Evidence From a Representative UK Survey
2026/05/13 by Simone Grassini, Saryz Taha Mamsheli, Amanda Tunes Paulsen +2 · 1 voice
Social Sciences · Medicine · Computer Science · #Ethics and Social Impacts of AI #Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education #Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
paper · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2666666
openalex publication_date 2026/05/13 · openalex created_date 2026/05/14 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/02
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is increasingly used in high-stakes decision-making, yet public acceptance depends on how ethical principles are weighed in specific contexts. We surveyed a representative sample of 300 UK adults to examine judgments of AI ethics in real-world applications. Participants rated the importance of fairness, transparency, privacy, nonmaleficence, and accountability, and evaluated six AI applications. All principles were strongly endorsed, with nonmaleficence and privacy rated highest. Perceived ethicality varied by context: healthcare diagnosis was judged most ethical, whereas autonomous weapons were judged least ethical. Women rated healthcare AI as less ethical than men. Endorsement of abstract ethical principles did not predict judgments in thematically matched scenarios, suggesting that case evaluations integrate multiple concerns. Positive general attitudes toward AI predicted higher ethicality ratings across domains, although this association weakened for autonomous weapons. Trust in automation, risk-taking, AI literacy, and moral foundations showed limited or no reliable effects.
Citations
- Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse
- User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
- Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues
- Trust in Automation
- Gender Differences in Preferences
- People are averse to machines making moral decisions
- Resistance to Medical Artificial Intelligence
- Task-Dependent Algorithm Aversion
- The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines
- Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research
- Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA
- Understanding how personality traits, experiences, and attitudes shape negative bias toward AI-generated artworks
- Ethical AI in HR: A Case Study of Tech Hiring
- Perceptions of AI Across Sectors: A Comparative Review of Public Attitudes
- Algorithmic Governance: Experimental Evidence on Citizens' and Public Administrators' Legitimacy Perceptions of Automated Decision‐Making
- Mapping Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence: Expectations, Risk-Benefit Tradeoffs, and Value As Determinants for Societal Acceptance
- Cultural Bias in Explainable AI Research: A Systematic Analysis
- Transparency and explainability of AI systems: From ethical guidelines to requirements
- Development and validation of the General Risk Propensity Scale (GRiPS)
- PsyToolkit
- Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (create).
- Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
- Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology
- Protected Values
- Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology
Discussions
Related