2024/09/09 by Marta Olazabal, Ana Terra Amorim‐Maia, Cecilia Alda‐Vidal +1 · 1 voice · 3 citations
Social Sciences · Agricultural and Biological Sciences · Environmental Science · #Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration #Climate change impacts on agriculture #Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
paper · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2024.101476
openalex publication_date 2024/09/09 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Imaginaries of adaptation are currently dominated by technocratic, homogenous, top-down approaches that hinder sustainable, just, and effective adaptation worldwide. We have identified three practices that contribute to this problem: (1) an assumption of universality in adaptation; (2) a neglect of pluralistic knowledge systems and values; and (3) an oversimplification of adaptation processes. These three practices have been found to lead to reproductions of vulnerabilities, unsustainable outcomes, or ephemeral changes. New ways of conceptualising and doing adaptation are necessary to expand imaginaries and visions around what adaptation can and cannot be. Through two examples (everyday adaptations and nature-based solutions), our review indicates that expanding or adopting alternative imaginaries of adaptation can help localise adaptation practice, particularly by acknowledging the need for multiple forms of knowledge and the iterative nature of adaptation governance processes. • Adaptation needs expanded imaginaries for pluralistic and inclusive future visions. • Universalisation of adaptation leads to solutions disconnected from local needs. • Multiple knowledges are needed to challenge top-down and technocratic approaches. • Adaptation is a messy, lengthy and iterative process of experimentation and learning. • Challenges and opportunities for expanded imaginaries are illustrated.