2021/01/01 by Mikhail Akulov
Social Sciences · #Soviet and Russian History
paper · doi:10.25162/jgo-2021-0021
crossref issued 2021/01/01 · crossref published 2021/01/01 · crossref published-print 2021/01/01 · openalex publication_date 2021/01/01 · crossref created 2023/03/03 · crossref deposited 2023/03/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2025/12/24 · crossref indexed 2026/07/30
This article reevaluates the Ukrainian state of Pavlo Skoropadsky without suscribing either to a nation-building or a class-centered narrative. It argues that the regime’s commitment to “normalcy” predisposed it towards reliance on “professionals” rather than politicians - with a declared purpose of overcoming “politics.” The state was intended to be a “technocratic” one, offering evidence of what “specialists” in power were capable of achieving. That said, the effect was not the overcoming, but the intensification of “politics.” Many of the “specialists” working within Ukrainian state institutions harbored hopes of turning Ukraine into a nucleus for a restored “Great Russia.” Still, this is not a story of sabotage, but of an ad hoc transformation, with numerous and diverse advocates of imperial restoration reaching a critical mass among Skoropadsky’s technocrats to influence the state’s trajectory. Thus, Skoropadsky’s tenure in power became, inadvertently, a time of growth and consolidation for a “Great Russia” lobby that was equally anxious about an independent Ukraine and the Bolshevik domination of Russia.