2005/02/01 by Amanda Datnow
paper · doi:10.1177/0013161x04269578
crossref created 2005/01/24 · crossref issued 2005/02/01 · crossref published 2005/02/01 · crossref published-online 2005/02/01 · crossref published-print 2005/02/01 · crossref deposited 2026/04/28 · crossref indexed 2026/07/24
This article addresses the sustainability of comprehensive school reform(CSR) models in the face of turbulent district and state contexts. It draws on qualitative data gathered in a longitudinal case study of six CSR models implemented in 13 schools in one urban district. Why do reforms sustain in some schools and not in others? How do changing state and district contexts influence reform sustainability in schools? After 3 years, reform efforts ceased in 6 of the 13 schools studied; two other schools were still implementing reforms but at very low levels. Only 5 of the 13 schools continued to implement their CSR models with moderate to high levels of intensity. Findings show that changing district and state contexts affected the sustainability of CSR models in schools differently depending on each school's strategy for dealing with the changes, as well as their local conditions, experiences with reform, and capacity.