2019/03/18 by Stephane Wolton · 1 voice
Social Sciences · #Media Influence and Politics #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Corruption and Economic Development
paper · doi:10.1111/ajps.12424
openalex publication_date 2019/03/18 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Abstract This article assesses the normative and positive claims regarding the consequences of biased media using a political agency framework that includes a strategic voter, polarized politicians, and news providers. My model predicts that voters are always better informed with unbiased than with biased outlets even when the latter have opposite ideological preferences. However, biased media may improve voter welfare. Contrary to several scholars' fears, partisan news providers are not always bad for democracy. My theoretical findings also have important implications for empirical analyses of the electoral consequences of changes in the media environment. The impact of left‐wing and right‐wing biased outlets depends on the partisan identity of officeholders. Empirical findings may, thus, not be comparable across studies or even over time within a study. Existing empirical works are unlikely to measure the consequences of biased media, as researchers never observe and can rarely approximate the adequate counterfactual: elections with unbiased news outlets.