Trusting emotional support from generative artificial intelligence: a conceptual review

2025/08/01 by Riccardo Volpato, Lisa M. DeBruine, Simone Stumpf · 2 voices · 1 citation
Computer Science · Psychology · Social Sciences · #AI in Service Interactions #Cognitive Functions and Memory #Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

paper · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100195

openalex publication_date 2025/08/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23

Abstract

People are increasingly using generative artificial intelligence (AI) for emotional support, creating trust-based interactions with limited predictability and transparency. We address the fragmented nature of research on trust in AI through a multidisciplinary conceptual review, examining theoretical foundations for understanding trust in the emerging context of emotional support from generative AI. Through an in-depth literature search across human-computer interaction, computer-mediated communication, social psychology, mental health, economics, sociology, philosophy, and science and technology studies, we developed two principal contributions. First, we summarise relevant definitions of trust across disciplines. Second, based on our first contribution, we define trust in the context of emotional support provided by AI and present a categorisation of relevant concepts that recur across well-established research areas. Our work equips researchers with a map for navigating the literature and formulating hypotheses about AI-based mental health support, as well as important theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for advancing research in this area.

Citations

• A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust1
• The weirdest people in the world?
• Trust in Automation
• Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems
• Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research
• On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
• Atlas of AI
• Trust as a Social Reality
• Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models
• Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignment
• Psychological measures aren’t toothbrushes
• Sociotechnical Safety Evaluation of Generative AI Systems
• Trust and reliance on AI — An experimental study on the extent and costs of overreliance on AI
• Expressing stigma and inappropriate responses prevents LLMs from safely replacing mental health providers.
• User Perceptions of Algorithmic Decisions in the Personalized AI System:Perceptual Evaluation of Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Explainability
• An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust
• Understanding the Benefits and Challenges of Using Large Language Model-based Conversational Agents for Mental Well-being Support
• Are lonely youngsters turning to chatbots for companionship? The relationship between chatbot usage and social connectedness in Danish high-school students
• The Open Source Advantage in Large Language Models (LLMs)
• Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Models
• Large Language Models are Capable of Offering Cognitive Reappraisal, if Guided
• The Typing Cure: Experiences with Large Language Model Chatbots for Mental Health Support
• Large Language Models in Mental Health Care: a Scoping Review
• Benefits and Harms of Large Language Models in Digital Mental Health
• Twenty-four years of empirical research on trust in AI: a bibliometric review of trends, overlooked issues, and future directions
• Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Society
• A longitudinal study of human–chatbot relationships
• My AI Friend: How Users of a Social Chatbot Understand Their Human–AI Friendship
• Trust in AI and Its Role in the Acceptance of AI Technologies
• Can people experience romantic love for artificial intelligence? An empirical study of intelligent assistants
• Beyond the Command: Feminist STS Research and Critical Issues for the Design of Social Machines
• Entanglement HCI The Next Wave?
• The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis.
• It’s only a computer: Virtual humans increase willingness to disclose
• Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
• Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust
• Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect.
• How AI and Human Behaviors Shape Psychosocial Effects of Extended Chatbot Use: A Longitudinal Randomized Controlled Study
• Has the concept of the therapeutic alliance outlived its usefulness?
• The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance.

Cited by

• Beyond Chat: a Framework for LLMs as Human-Centered Support Systems

Discussions

• Happy to share the first article of my PhD journey at @uofglasgow.bsky.social and @socialai.bsky.social @debruine.bsky.social, Prof Stumpf and I reviewed ~150 articles from 10 disciplines about trust [bsky, 4 points, 0 comments]
• I read Volpato et al. (2025; doi.org/10.1016/j.ch...) for an assignment, and out of curiosity I looked up the author. Turns out they're from my University, which is a fun coincidence. Then I find my d [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]

Related

• Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research
• Revisiting Trust in the Era of Generative AI: Factorial Structure and Latent Profiles
• In generative artificial intelligence we trust: unpacking determinants and outcomes for cognitive trust
• Feeling Machines: Ethics, Culture, and the Rise of Emotional AI
• Trust in AI: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions