Correction to Feddersen and Pesendorfer (1998)

2026/06/15 by Sami Petersen · 1 voice
Social Sciences · #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Political Philosophy and Ethics #Political Science Research and Education

paper · pdf · doi:10.1017/s0003055426101762

openalex publication_date 2026/06/15 · openalex created_date 2026/06/18 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/14

Abstract

The proof of Proposition 2 in Feddersen and Pesendorfer (1998, American Political Science Review 92(1): 23–35) is flawed. This note presents an elementary direct proof of the result.

Citations

• Convicting the Innocent: The Inferiority of Unanimous Jury Verdicts under Strategic Voting

Discussions

• Credit to the APSR: they published a correction to a 30-year old paper doi.org/10.1017/S000... [bsky, 4 points, 0 comments]

Related

• Corrections to "On continued fractions of given period"
• Notes on a proof of Bonet, Engliš and Taskinen
• Refuting Feder, Kinne and Rafiey
• A correction to: Rational and nearly rational varieties
• Critique of J. Kim's "P is not equal to NP by Modus Tollens"