The enduring presence of ‘Fuzzy Wuzzy Angels’: an anti-colonial analysis

2025/04/10 by Erika K. Smith, Ingrid Matthews · 1 voice
Social Sciences · #Caribbean history, culture, and politics

paper · pdf · doi:10.1080/2201473x.2025.2488090

openalex publication_date 2025/04/10 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/16

Abstract

Since the 1500s, Europeans have labelled the distinct Peoples of Papua New Guinea in various ways. Drawing on a wide range of historical accounts, literature, film, and media, this paper presents an analysis of colonial naming practices relevant to the enduring Australian claim that ‘Fuzzy Wuzzy Angel’ is a term of affection and welcomed by its subjects. We argue that Fuzzy Wuzzy Angel cannot be disaggregated from its colonial origins. The research contributes to broader discussions about the persistent coloniality that characterises Australia-Papua New Guinea relations, despite formal declarations of independence. This contextualisation of the origins and shifting meanings of Fuzzy Wuzzy Angel sheds light on ways that power is reinscribed and reinforced through stories and images to maintain ideological and cultural dominance.

Discussions

• Thrilled to see another post from @aunz.theconversation.com about our piece! If you’re wondering about the prevalence of the term, keep in mind it was used just last year in Parliament House to an au [bsky, 5 points, 0 comments]

Related

• ‘The Moat of Oblivion’: Australia and the Forgetting of Papua New Guinea
• ‘Thinking in Papua New Guinean Terms’: the Sensitive Files Case of 1972 and Australia’s Migrated Archive
• Indigenous Reservations in Australia and New Caledonia: A Colonial Reality and Its Variations in Aboriginal and Kanak Worlds
• On the Sacred Clay of Botany Bay: Landings, National Memorialization, and Multiple Sovereignties
• Settler Colonial Dynamics Across the Coral Sea: White Australia and the Contours of French Settlement in New Caledonia