The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application

2020/06/17 by Silvia Minozzi, Michela Cinquini, Silvia Gianola +3 · 4 citations
Decision Sciences · Mathematics · #Advanced Causal Inference Techniques #Meta-analysis and systematic reviews #Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

paper · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.015

openalex publication_date 2020/06/17 · crossref created 2020/06/17 · crossref issued 2020/10/01 · crossref published 2020/10/01 · crossref published-print 2020/10/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · crossref deposited 2025/10/12 · crossref indexed 2026/07/22 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29

Citations

• High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes
• GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
• The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

Cited by

• Optimal Dosage Characteristics of Recasting for Developmental Language Disorder: A Scoping Review
• Zero‐ and few‐shot prompting of generative large language models provides weak assessment of risk of bias in clinical trials
• Operationalization of Cochrane’s Risk of Bias 2 Tool (RoB 2) in the Context of Psychotherapy Trials
• Optimizing ward rounds: systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to enhance patient safety