Effect size guidelines for cross-lagged effects.

2022/06/23 by Ulrich Orth, Laurenz L. Meier, Janina Larissa Bühler +4 · 19 citations
Decision Sciences · Psychology · #Behavioral Health and Interventions #Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction #Psychometric Methodologies and Testing

paper · doi:10.1037/met0000499

openalex publication_date 2022/06/23 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30

Abstract

Cross-lagged models are by far the most commonly used method to test the prospective effect of one construct on another, yet there are no guidelines for interpreting the size of cross-lagged effects. This research aims to establish empirical benchmarks for cross-lagged effects, focusing on the cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) and the random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM). We drew a quasirepresentative sample of studies published in four subfields of psychology (i.e., developmental, social-personality, clinical, and industrial-organizational). The dataset included 1,028 effect sizes for the CLPM and 302 effect sizes for the RI-CLPM, based on data from 174 samples. For the CLPM, the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the distribution corresponded to cross-lagged effect sizes of .03, .07, and .12, respectively. For the RI-CLPM, the corresponding values were .02, .05, and .11. Effect sizes did not differ significantly between the CLPM and RI-CLPM. Moreover, effect sizes did not differ significantly across subfields and were not moderated by design characteristics. However, effect sizes were moderated by the concurrent correlation between the constructs and the stability of the predictor. Based on the findings, we propose to use .03 (small effect), .07 (medium effect), and .12 (large effect) as benchmark values when interpreting the size of cross-lagged effects, for both the CLPM and RI-CLPM. In addition to aiding in the interpretation of results, the present findings will help researchers plan studies by providing information needed to conduct power analyses and estimate minimally required sample sizes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Citations

• Correlational effect size benchmarks.
• A power primer.
• Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It
• The link between self-esteem and social relationships: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.
• Testing prospective effects in longitudinal research: Comparing seven competing cross-lagged models.
• Three Extensions of the Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model
• Empirically derived guidelines for effect size interpretation in social psychology

Cited by

• Understanding bidirectional and transactional relations in parent and offspring mental health: Using COVID‐19 pandemic data to gain insights
• Predicting the future from fear: An RI‐CLPM analysis of risk appraisals and long‐term psychological well‐being
• Longitudinal bidirectional relation between fear of missing out and risky loot box consumption: Evidence for FoMO-Driven loot boxes spiral hypothesis
• Maternal Stress and Bonding in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mothers’ Relationship Quality With the Partner as a Resilience Factor
• Community Identity and Community Participation: Disentangling Within‐Person Dynamics From Between‐Person Differences
• Dissociations of Cognitive Control and Reward Sensitivity on Decision‐Making Under Uncertainty in Adolescents: Insights From Computational Modeling
• Longitudinal Relationships Across Bullying Victimization, Friendship and Social Support, and Internalizing Symptoms in Early-to-Middle Adolescence: A Developmental Cascades Investigation
• Are smartphones stress-inducing or stress-buffering for adolescents? An experience-sampling study
• How do social media use, gaming frequency, and internalizing symptoms predict each other over time in early-to-middle adolescence?
• Do Stress, Depression, and Anxiety Lead to Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories?
• Bidirectional associations between parental negativity and child externalising problems: Social support and neighbourhood cohesion as moderators
• Longitudinal dyadic interplay between marital conflict and psychological well‐being in couples: The moderating roles of wives' employment
• Feeling Well, Functioning Well: How Psychological Well-Being Predicts Later Self-Control, but Not the Other Way Around
• Threat Perceptions and Closeness to Refugees: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study
• Parenting and adolescent anxiety within families: a biweekly longitudinal study
• Longitudinal associations among adult attachment orientations, emotion regulation tendencies, and transdiagnostic anxiety and depression symptoms in young adults
• Planned missingness in intensive longitudinal studies: Extensions and comparisons of multiform designs
• Reciprocal associations between sense of purpose and subjective well-being in old age
• The cognitive benefits of online microtargeted political ads: explaining attitudes, political interest, and campaign knowledge

Related

• Testing prospective effects in longitudinal research: Comparing seven competing cross-lagged models.
• Correlational effect size benchmarks.
• Three Extensions of the Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model
• Using Instrumental Variables to Measure Causation over Time in Cross-Lagged Panel Models
• Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation.