2001/05/02 by Grace Ngai, David Yarowsky
Computer Science · #cs.CL #cs.AI
published as Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 117-125, Hong Kong (2000) · 9 pages, 4 figures, appeared in ACL2000
arxiv created 2001/05/02 · arxiv updated 2009/11/30
This paper presents a comprehensive empirical comparison between two approaches for developing a base noun phrase chunker: human rule writing and active learning using interactive real-time human annotation. Several novel variations on active learning are investigated, and underlying cost models for cross-modal machine learning comparison are presented and explored. Results show that it is more efficient and more successful by several measures to train a system using active learning annotation rather than hand-crafted rule writing at a comparable level of human labor investment.