2025/09/18 by Tamir Libel, Barış Ateş
Social Sciences · #Canadian Identity and History #Military History and Strategy #Military, Security, and Education Studies
paper · doi:10.1177/0095327x251371307
openalex publication_date 2025/09/18 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31
This article explores the evolution of academic–military relations within professional military education (PME) organizations and between them and higher education authorities in Australia, France, Germany, Israel, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Traditionally distinct from universities in governance, curriculum quality, and faculty composition, PME organizations have increasingly aligned with academic standards, practices, and norms since the end of the Cold War to enhance officer competence. The article outlines these transformations, introduces a typology of academic–military relations, and examines their implications for the legitimacy of officership as a profession amid shifting control over education and commissioning processes. The main findings of the article reveal that the cooperation with civilian universities and accreditation requirements have facilitated the diversification of curricula and teaching staff, successfully dismantling the traditional military monopoly over the PME. Furthermore, it is increasingly administered under the auspices of joint-level headquarters, indicating a decline in the influence of any single service on PME.