Classification for Effective Rehabilitation

1990/03/01 by D. A. ANDREWS, D. A. Andrews, JAMES BONTA +3 · 10 citations
Medicine · Psychology · #Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints #Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending #Traumatic Brain Injury Research

paper · doi:10.1177/0093854890017001004

openalex publication_date 1990/03/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31

Abstract

Four principles of classification for effective rehabilitation are reviewed: risk, need, responsivity, and professional override. Many examples of Case x Treatment interactions are presented to illustrate the principles.

Cited by

• The Sexual Recidivism Rates of Women Are Still Low: An Updated Meta‐Analysis
• Supportive Messages Female Offenders Receive From Probation and Parole Officers About Substance Avoidance: Message Perceptions and Effects
• Carrying Water in a Basket: Challenges of Offenders’ Rehabilitation in Nigerian Correctional Facilities
• Rehabilitation: Beyond Nothing Works
• Good Lives Model (GLM) et alliance avec l’auteur d’infraction : quel apport selon différentes modalités d’entretien (individuel, groupe, réalité virtuelle) ?
• A Study of Zero Tolerance Policies in Schools: A Multi-Integrated Systems Approach to Improve Outcomes for Adolescents
• Women’s Risk Factors and Their Contributions to Existing Risk/Needs Assessment
• The Predictive Validity of a Gender-Responsive Needs Assessment
• Predicting the Prison Misconducts of Women Offenders
• A Meta-Analysis of Moral Reconation Therapy

Related

• What is rehabilitation? An empirical investigation leading to an evidence-based description
• Is rehabilitation's unifying expertise its holistic scope and cognitive approach to the patient's problems? An exploration
• Rehabilitation – a new approach. Part two: the underlying theories
• Study protocol for a scoping review on rehabilitation scoping reviews
• Cognitive Rehabilitation Frameworks for persons with Acquired Brain Injury- A scoping Review