2019/06/03 by Melanie Magin, Stefan Geiß
Social Sciences · #Media Influence and Politics #Media Studies and Communication #Social Media and Politics
paper · doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1608605
openalex publication_date 2019/06/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Theorizing on mediatization of politics stresses the importance of structural conditions on different levels of media systems for explaining the increasing importance of media logic in media coverage. Levels of autonomy of media from politics and the extent of commercialization pressure are considered particularly important. However, most studies investigate differences between countries and the passing of time as proxies and qualitatively infer which structural conditions might account for the level of mediatization. The current study goes beyond these proxies. It reviews and systematizes how structural autonomy from political institutions and extent of commercialization pressure influences the importance of media logic in media coverage and operationalizes these influences in a comparative analysis of election campaign coverage in Germany and Austria over 60 years. A multi-level analysis finds that between-country differences and within-country changes in macro- and meso-level autonomy from politics/commercialization pressure account for a large part of the time/space (campaign/country) variation of the importance of media logic. It complements earlier research (1) by demonstrating that between-country differences and within-country changes in media coverage reflect underlying media structures; (2) by specifying which structural influences (representing the media’s autonomy from politics and commercialization pressure) are most important in shaping the importance of media logic in campaign coverage.