Borrowed Credibility: How Threats Become Coercive Through Collective Memory

2026/07/28 by Steven Windisch
Psychology · Social Sciences · #Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion #Misinformation and Its Impacts #Social and Intergroup Psychology

paper · doi:10.1080/1057610x.2026.2707965

openalex publication_date 2026/07/28 · openalex created_date 2026/07/29 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30

Abstract

This study draws on 26 in-depth interviews with U.S. election officials who received death threats to examine how participants experienced these messages. While most threats were dismissed, others produced behavioral change. Across the sample, threats referencing well-known acts of violence were seen as more imaginable. Because of this, I argue that threats gain coercive power when they tap into collective memories of harm, which increases perceived plausibility and credibility. Overall, the current model explains one mechanism through which threats can influence behavior by showing how collective memory shapes perceptions of plausibility and credibility, even when violence does not occur.

Related

• The Illusion of Democratic Credibility
• Breaching of the U.S. Capitol: memory and moral judgment
• “We have nothing to do with it”: How statements of denial by armed actors shape public perceptions and emotions
• Building from the Brain: Advancing the Study of Threat Perception in International Relations
• Generating Collective Social Safety in Times of Political Change: The Motivating Effects of Inexplicable Behavior