2023/07/08 by Andreas Liesenfeld, Alianda Lopez, Mark Dingemanse · 2 voices · 7 citations
Computer Science · #Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) #Reinforcement Learning in Robotics #Software Engineering Research #cs.CL
paper · pdf · doi:10.1145/3571884.3604316
openalex publication_date 2023/07/17 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Large language models that exhibit instruction-following behaviour represent one of the biggest recent upheavals in conversational interfaces, a trend in large part fuelled by the release of OpenAI’s ChatGPT, a proprietary large language model for text generation fine-tuned through reinforcement learning from human feedback (LLM+RLHF). We review the risks of relying on proprietary software and survey the first crop of open-source projects of comparable architecture and functionality. The main contribution of this paper is to show that openness is differentiated, and to offer scientific documentation of degrees of openness in this fast-moving field. We evaluate projects in terms of openness of code, training data, model weights, RLHF data, licensing, scientific documentation, and access methods. We find that while there is a fast-growing list of projects billing themselves as ‘open source’, many inherit undocumented data of dubious legality, few share the all-important instruction-tuning (a key site where human annotation labour is involved), and careful scientific documentation is exceedingly rare. Degrees of openness are relevant to fairness and accountability at all points, from data collection and curation to model architecture, and from training and fine-tuning to release and deployment.