2026/05/28 by Sophia Stutzmann, Sebastian Koos · 2 voices
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Social Sciences · #Digital Economy and Work Transformation #Energy, Environment, Economic Growth #Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
paper · pdf · doi:10.1017/s0143814x26101172
openalex publication_date 2026/05/28 · openalex created_date 2026/05/29 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/06
Abstract The twin digital and green transition constitutes a major societal challenge in the upcoming decades. To remain competitive, governments need to invest in both transformations. However, budgetary limits constitute trade-offs in addressing both simultaneously. At the same time, both transformations have far-reaching consequences for labor markets. Yet, we know very little about citizens’ preferences for relative public spending on both transitions and their determinants. Here, we examine the role of subjective labor market risk resulting from these transitions in shaping relative spending preferences. We argue that individuals might prefer to spend less on the societal transformation they perceive as a job threat (single-pressuredness), while cross-pressuredness by both transitions leads to an equal split. Drawing on novel comparative survey data from six countries, we find that individuals prefer to divert investment from the transition they perceive as a threat to their jobs, while cross-pressuredness moves people slightly towards equal investment.