Building AI Companions that Prioritise Learning over Performance
2026/05/06 by Hassan Khosravi, Dragan Gasevic, Shazia Sadiq +7 · 2 voices
Computer Science · #cs.HC
paper · pdf
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming knowledge work by improving the quality and efficiency of tasks such as writing, coding, and data analysis. However, their growing use in education has exposed a learning-performance paradox: while they can enhance short-term task performance, they may also undermine genuine learning, including cognitive growth, knowledge transfer, and metacognitive development. This paper addresses the question of how artificial intelligence should be designed and used to support learning rather than merely improve immediate outputs. We introduce the concept of AI learning companions, defined as adaptive, pedagogically informed, LLM-powered agents designed for integration into learning environments. We propose a framework for their design built on three interrelated foundations: a pedagogical foundation focused on how students learn with AI, an adaptive foundation focused on how AI learns about students, and a responsible design foundation ensuring systems remain transparent, accountable, inclusive, and secure. The framework is illustrated through five case studies spanning diverse educational contexts, levels, and tool designs, revealing both the promise and current limitations of existing tools. We conclude that there is a necessary shift away from LLMs designed for task-oriented performance, and beyond simply prompting them to act as tutors, toward deliberately developed AI learning companions that are pedagogically sound, adapt to their learners, and foster durable understanding, metacognitive growth, and learner agency.
Citations
- ChatGPT in Education: An Effect in Search of a Cause
- AI Tutors vs. Tenacious Myths: Evidence from Personalised Dialogue Interventions in Education
- Comparing Generative AI and teacher feedback: student perceptions of usefulness and trustworthiness
- Can Large Language Models Match Tutoring System Adaptivity? A Benchmarking Study
- Training LLM-based Tutors to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Dialogues
- Agent4Edu: Generating Learner Response Data by Generative Agents for Intelligent Education Systems
- Hybrid intelligence: Human– AI coevolution and learning
- Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance
- Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies
- Enhancing LLM-Based Feedback: Insights from Intelligent Tutoring Systems and the Learning Sciences
- Bringing Generative AI to Adaptive Learning in Education
- CodeHelp: Using Large Language Models with Guardrails for Scalable Support in Programming Classes
- Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence
- Generative AI at Work
- The Impact of AI on Developer Productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilot
- Knowledge Tracing: A Survey
- Knowledge Tracing: A Survey
- Context-Aware Attentive Knowledge Tracing
- The effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on K‐12 students' reading comprehension: A meta‐analysis
- Ensuring Fairness in Machine Learning to Advance Health Equity
- AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations
- Examining Productive Failure, Productive Success, Unproductive Failure, and Unproductive Success in Learning
- The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes
- The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems
- Signature pedagogies in the professions
- Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one‐to‐one tutoring
- Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned
Discussions
Related