Measuring consciousness: Is one measure better than the other?

2010/02/05 by Kristian Sandberg, Bert Timmermans, Morten Overgaard +1 · 11 citations
Neuroscience · #Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies #EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces #Neural dynamics and brain function

paper · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.013

Citations

• Priming with and without awareness

Cited by

• Measuring any conscious content versus measuring the relevant conscious content: Comment on Sandberg et al.
• Evaluating false positive rates of standard and hierarchical measures of metacognitive accuracy
• Invisible stimuli, implicit thresholds: Why invisibility judgments\n cannot be interpreted in isolation
• Auditory awareness negativity is an electrophysiological correlate of awareness in an auditory threshold task
• Using virtual reality to induce multi-trial inattentional blindness despite trial-by-trial measures of awareness
• The Relation Between Subjective and Objective Measures of Visual Awareness: Current Evidence, Attempt of a Synthesis and Future Research Directions
• More than words: can free reports adequately measure the richness of perception?
• Occipital MEG Activity in the Early Time Range (<300 ms) Predicts Graded Changes in Perceptual Consciousness
• When Perception Trumps Reality
• In Search of an Integrative Method to Study Unconscious Processing: An Application of Bayesian and General Recognition Theory Models to the Processing of Hierarchical Patterns in the Absence of Awareness
• Unconscious Processing Contaminates Objective Measures of Conscious Perception: Evidence From the Liminal Prime Paradigm