Administrative Exclusion: Organizations and the Hidden Costs of Welfare Claiming
2010/01/15 by Evelyn Z. Brodkin, E. Z. Brodkin, M. Majmundar +1 · 14 citations
Social Sciences · #Public Policy and Administration Research #Social Policy and Reform Studies
paper · pdf · doi:10.1093/jopart/mup046
openalex publication_date 2010/01/15 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Abstract
Organizations operate as the gateway to public benefits. They are formally authorized to adjudicate claims, in the process interpreting and applying eligibility rules. Beyond their designated role, they also operate as informal gatekeepers, developing modes of operation that affect the ease or difficulty of claiming. Operational practices—both formally prescribed and informally created—can add hidden costs to claiming to the extent that they are complicated, confusing, or cumbersome. Individuals implicitly recognize these costs when they complain of being “tied up in red tape” or given the “bureaucratic run around.” This inquiry examines whether these types of hidden organizational costs can have systematic effects, resulting in administrative exclusion—that is, nonparticipation attributable to organizational factors rather than claimant preferences or eligibility status.
Citations
Cited by
- Administrative Burden: Learning, Psychological, and Compliance Costs in Citizen-State Interactions
- Policy Work: Street-Level Organizations Under New Managerialism
- The Bite of Administrative Burden: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation
- (Doing) belonging as technology of power: how the principle of ‘gender equality’ governs membership in Swiss society
- To Claim or Not to Claim: Investigating Non-Take-Up of Welfare Schemes Targeting Hong Kong Older Adults and the Stigma Attached to Them
- Are bureaucrats' interactions with politicians linked to the bureaucrats' policy entrepreneurship tendencies?
- Bureaucratic redundancy and administrative burden: Evidence from public‐private partnerships (PPPs) in China
- Worth the effort? Compliance costs, heuristics, and perceived program accessibility
- How effective are behavioral interventions to increase the take‐up of social benefits? A systematic review of field experiments
- Administrative Errors and Race: Can Technology Mitigate Inequitable Administrative Outcomes?
- Three Decades Since Making Ends Meet : How Single-Mother Families Survive Today
- Digital Transformation, Administrative Burden, and Citizen–State Interactions: A Case of the Old Age Allowance Policy in China
- Red Tape, Rule Legitimacy, and Public Service Motivation: Experimental Evidence From Korean Citizens
- Local Control, Discretion, and Administrative Burden: SNAP Interview Waivers and Caseloads During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Related