2008/11/18 by Deborah Baumgold · 1 citation
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · #American Constitutional Law and Politics #Political Theology and Sovereignty #Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
paper · doi:10.1177/0090591708323363
openalex publication_date 2008/11/18 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30
Idiosyncrasies of Hobbes's composition process, together with a paucity of reliable autobiographical materials and the norms of seventeenth-century manuscript production, render interpretation of his political theory particularly difficult and contentious. These difficulties are surveyed here under three headings: (1) the process of “serial” composition (meaning the production of multiple, often expanded, versions of a work), which was common in the period; (2) the relationship between Hobbes's three political-theory texts— the Elements of Law, De Cive, and Leviathan, which is basic to defining the textual embodiment of his theory, and controversial; and (3) his method of writing. I argue that Hobbes's composition process undercut his intention to produce a deductive, logical theory of politics and opened the door to inconsistency and muddle in his arguments.