2026/06/25 by Amber Spry, Shayla C. Nunnally
Social Sciences · #Critical Race Theory in Education #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Social and Intergroup Psychology
paper · doi:10.1017/s1049096526102133
openalex publication_date 2026/06/25 · openalex created_date 2026/06/26 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
ABSTRACT This article explores support for Black Lives Matter through the lens of intergroup conflict and solidarity—concepts at the core of Paula D. McClain’s research. We examine the extent to which expressions of “American identity” amplify support for or opposition to the Black Lives Matter movement. The merits of protest are perceived differently across racial groups in the United States, but theories of superordinate identity suggest attitudes could be unified through common expressions of a shared identity. Using 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey data (N=3,711; sum of Black and white respondents), we employ multivariate regression analysis to show that although Black and white respondents express similarly strong levels of a superordinate “American identity,” American identity moderates Black and white support for Black Lives Matter inconsistently—and at times in opposing directions. These findings provide additional context for understanding how American identity relates to support for protest activity, suggesting that American identity can assume distinct meanings for different groups of Americans.