2020/01/02 by Archie Thomas, Hannah Forsyth, Andrew G. Bonnell · 1 voice
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · #Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis #Higher Education Governance and Development #Philosophy, History, and Historiography
paper · doi:10.1080/14490854.2020.1717350
This article responds to debate over casualisation within the Australian Historical Association (AHA) and within the history profession in Australia more generally. It is argued that competing interests increasingly govern relations between salaried and casual academics. The article seeks to historicise these competing interests within the discipline in the history of Australian universities since the late 1980s. The authors draw on Marx’s descriptions of the ‘reserve army of labour’ and recent sociological debates over precarity to describe the political economy that has produced a casual academic workforce. By also analysing the effects of recent shifts in the structure of academic work more widely, the article advocates for solidarity, on the basis of academic historians’ shared precarity in the university sector. It then points to how historians might marshal their research resources to derive lessons from the past, in the service of protecting historians as a community, particularly for those most affected by the trend towards precarity.