Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.

1994/12/01 by Domenic V. Cicchetti · 10 citations

paper · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284

Cited by

• Partnering with Generative AI: Experimental Evaluation of Human-Led and Model-Led Interaction in Human-AI Co-Creation
• Higher Pitch, Slower Tempo, and Greater Stability in Singing than in Conversation among Mandarin speakers in Auckland: A Registered Report Replicating Ozaki et al. (2024)
• Exploring the psychophysiological predictors of performance under stress: insights from a machine learning approach
• Phase IV international prospective validation of the EORTC patient satisfaction core questionnaire (EORTC PATSAT-C33) and outpatient module (EORTC OUT-PATSAT7)
• The role of empirical evidence in philosophy
• A Two-Feature Quantitative EEG Index of Pediatric Epilepsy Severity: External Pre-Validation on CHB-MIT and Roadmap to Dravet Cohorts
• Computational Mechanisms of Approach-Avoidance Conflict Predictively Differentiate Between Affective and Substance Use Disorders
• Psychometric Validation of the Adapted Pet Attachment Questionnaire in Measuring Human–Horse Attachment
• Contextual auditory processing in the inferior colliculus is affected in a sex- and age-dependent manner in the valproic acid-induced rat model of autism
• Unraveling the impact of prenatal air pollution for neonatal brain maturation